aleph.land is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A small island of the fediverse. א

Administered by:

Server stats:

58
active users

#agpl

1 post1 participant0 posts today
petites singularités<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://musician.social/@mirlo" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>mirlo</span></a></span> The Discourse team will host an instance for you for free since your're <a href="https://ps.s10y.eu/tags/AGPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AGPL</span></a> software (congratulations on the license switch BTW).</p><p>Is this right <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://infosec.exchange/@codinghorror" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>codinghorror</span></a></span>?</p>
Arne Babenhauserheide<p>I want every program that’s required to participate productively in society to be <a href="https://rollenspiel.social/tags/FreeSoftware" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FreeSoftware</span></a> </p><p>Because Free Software allows me to avoid direct remote control of what I can do. And it enables me to help others with my <a href="https://rollenspiel.social/tags/programming" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>programming</span></a> skills.</p><p>That’s why I think we need <a href="https://rollenspiel.social/tags/copyleft" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>copyleft</span></a>. Ideally the <a href="https://rollenspiel.social/tags/AGPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AGPL</span></a>, because only that keeps webservices free. And those are programs, too.</p><p>(a discussion got me thinking why I contribute to FLOSS projects; besides wanting to share what I create, this is the reason)</p>
Matthias Kirschner<p>After previously pushing <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Neo4j" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Neo4j</span></a> to correct their abuse of the <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/AGPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AGPL</span></a> our sister organisation the <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://hostux.social/@fsf" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>fsf</span></a></span> now submitted an amicus brief to defend <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/softwarefreedom" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>softwarefreedom</span></a> . The <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/GNU" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GNU</span></a> licenses were designed to empower users and it is important that we as <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/FreeSoftware" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FreeSoftware</span></a> community make sure this is understood.</p><p><a href="https://www.fsf.org/news/fsf-submits-amicus-brief-in-neo4j-v-suhy" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">fsf.org/news/fsf-submits-amicu</span><span class="invisible">s-brief-in-neo4j-v-suhy</span></a></p>
small circle 🕊 in calmness<p>Weird that <a href="https://social.coop/tags/DuckDuckGo" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DuckDuckGo</span></a> always finds the <a href="https://social.coop/tags/Wikipedia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Wikipedia</span></a> entry where relevant, but not when searching on <a href="https://social.coop/tags/AGPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AGPL</span></a>, where it is missing from the entire first results page.</p><p><a href="https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&amp;q=agpl&amp;ia=web" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&amp;q=agpl&amp;</span><span class="invisible">ia=web</span></a></p>
Boud<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.ouvaton.coop/@ouvaton" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>ouvaton</span></a></span> Je ne savais pas que le code source d'Overleaf soit sous l' <a href="https://framapiaf.org/tags/AGPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AGPL</span></a> . Ce qui implique que chaque instance doit de façon *évidente* informer ses utilisateurs de cela : "a convenient and prominently visible feature" [0]</p><p>A coup d'oeil et par <a href="https://framapiaf.org/tags/SearXNG" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SearXNG</span></a> j'ai l'impression qu'Overleaf.com viole grossièrement l' <a href="https://framapiaf.org/tags/AGPLv3" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AGPLv3</span></a> . La licence est hyper-cachée.</p><p><a href="https://framapiaf.org/tags/AGPLViolation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AGPLViolation</span></a> <a href="https://framapiaf.org/tags/AGPLv3Compliance" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AGPLv3Compliance</span></a> </p><p>[0] <a href="https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="">gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html</span><span class="invisible"></span></a><br>[1] <a href="https://www.overleaf.com" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="">overleaf.com</span><span class="invisible"></span></a><br>[2] <a href="https://search.ononoki.org/search?q=overleaf+agpl" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">search.ononoki.org/search?q=ov</span><span class="invisible">erleaf+agpl</span></a><br>[3] <a href="https://search.ononoki.org/search?q=overleaf+affero" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">search.ononoki.org/search?q=ov</span><span class="invisible">erleaf+affero</span></a></p>
jay<p>I've found an local <a href="https://social.tchncs.de/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> model for image upscaling, while beeing <a href="https://social.tchncs.de/tags/FLOSS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FLOSS</span></a> <a href="https://social.tchncs.de/tags/AGPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AGPL</span></a> 🥳</p><p>Added new possibilities to our eCommerce workflow at work 🤯, simplifying some really tedious bits.<br> <br>No cloud, account or ads.. that's impressive nowadays!</p><p><a href="https://github.com/upscayl/upscayl" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">github.com/upscayl/upscayl</span><span class="invisible"></span></a><br><a href="https://upscayl.org/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">upscayl.org/</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p><a href="https://social.tchncs.de/tags/upscayl" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>upscayl</span></a> <a href="https://social.tchncs.de/tags/sysadmin" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>sysadmin</span></a></p>
Free Software Foundation<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.sfconservancy.org/users/conservancy" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>conservancy</span></a></span> spent their holidays writing a strong Amicus brief in the appealed Neo4j, Inc v. PureThink, LLC case setting the record straight on <a href="https://hostux.social/tags/UserRights" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>UserRights</span></a> in section 7 of the <a href="https://hostux.social/tags/AGPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AGPL</span></a>. Read it here: <a href="https://u.fsf.org/45e" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">u.fsf.org/45e</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p>
Stefano Zacchiroli<p>Very important work by <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.sfconservancy.org/users/conservancy" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>conservancy</span></a></span> , which tries to ensure the right of recipients of <a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/AGPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AGPL</span></a> (but more generally: *GPLs) software to strip disguised "Further restriction" clauses in free/#opensource software: <a href="https://sfconservancy.org/news/2025/jan/13/neo4j-amicus/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">sfconservancy.org/news/2025/ja</span><span class="invisible">n/13/neo4j-amicus/</span></a> . It is unfortunately something that happens quite often on the market (even here in France!), where such clauses are regularly used by vendors to turn standard <a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/FOSS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FOSS</span></a> licenses into <a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/badgeware" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>badgeware</span></a> ones.</p>
futo_tech<h2>Louis Rossmann Shows You How to Install Immich</h2> <p><a href="https://peertube.futo.org/videos/watch/a3d9253c-47f4-44f9-b4e8-f9a4bb61e949" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">peertube.futo.org/videos/watch</span><span class="invisible">/a3d9253c-47f4-44f9-b4e8-f9a4bb61e949</span></a></p>
Public

Nous saluons la publication sous licence #AGPL du logiciel Biblys, solution e-commerce au service de l'édition indépendante !

blog.biblys.fr/posts/biblys-es

Depuis hier vous pouvez trouver le code source de #Biblys ainsi qu'une bibliothèque en #PHP pour gérer les ISBN et EAN.

Félicitations à Clément Latzarus pour cette démarche indispensable d'ouverture qui lui a pris plus de sept ans pour l'accomplir dans les meilleures conditions !

Le blog BiblysBiblys est désormais un logiciel libreBy Clément Latzarus
Public

Vous agissez dans la #santé au #travail ? Vous êtes IDEST, médecins du travail, IPRP ou autre dans un #SPST interentreprises ? Vous avez besoin d'analyser transversalement l'effectif de vos 400 à 500 entreprises, 7 à 10 000 salariés, et de mettre en face la sinistralité AT MP ?
Mon webmaster a été dans ce cas. Il a fait de cette problématique un outil sous licence libre (#AGPL) devenu sujet de DIU pour valider son évolution professionnelle.
A découvrir ici : st.medshake.net

st.medshake.netMedShakeST : cartographie des risques professionnels à partir des codes NAF
Public

The year is fast on its way into its final quarter, which means the #FOSS release of #Mattrbld is coming closer.

A big part of that is the licence, of course. I want Mattrbld (and potential derivatives) to be accessible to all, forever. Which is why I’m considering the #AGPL licence (since technically it’s a SaaS product).

Is there anything that would speak against this choice? Are there some special considerations to take before applying the licence? 🤔

Public

"Decentralized communication protocol Matrix shifts to less-permissive AGPL open source license."

"AGPLv3 is a recognized open source license, even though not everyone is a fan of its inherent restrictions."

#PaulSawers, 2023

techcrunch.com/2023/11/06/dece

Yeah, we get it Paul. Having to help with the dishes after you eat your free lunch is "restrictive". It's more "permissive" to let people waltz in, eat their fill, and bugger off, without being expected to help out 🙄

TechCrunch · Decentralized communication protocol Matrix shifts to less-permissive AGPL open source license | TechCrunchElement, the company and core developer behind the decentralized communication protocol known as Matrix, has announced a notable license change that will
Public

Can someone explain the #AGPL to me?

For example: :gitannex: #gitAnnex is licensed under AGPL3+. So if a company bases their product on it and they provide an online service that involves git-annex in the {front,back,}end, then... what? They would need to make their entire stack AGPL-compatible, i.e. provide the source code? Or only if they changed something in git annex they would need to make *their* version of git annex public, not their entire stack?

Public

Yesterday I spent a few minutes switching my main two repositories from #GPL to #AGPL licenses because GPL has a loophole that I wanted closed.

tl;dr: GPL can be ignored if the code is being accessed via a server based API.

I've no idea why that wasn't covered by default.

To me the default should be everything and people could then choose looser licenses where they choose to permit certain uses without code sharing.

Be-aware!
#FOSS #Copyright #Licensing #OpenSource